Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Preclinical studies suggest that argon (Ar) might diminish the neurological and myocardial damage after any hypoxic-ischemic insult. Indeed, Ar has been tested in different models of ischemic insult, at concentrations ranging from 20% up to 80%. Overall, Ar emerged as a protective agent on cells, tissues and organs, showing less cell death, reduced infarct size and faster functional recovery. More specifically, encouraging data has been reported in animal studies on cardiac arrest (CA) in which a better and faster neurological recovery was achieved when Ar was used in the post-resuscitation ventilation. More importantly, these benefits have been replicated in different studies, enrolling both small and large animals. Finally, ventilation with Ar in O2 has been demonstrated to be safe both in animals and humans. Based on this evidence, a clinical translation is advocated. Thus, the CardioPulmonary resuscitation with Argon - CPAr trial has been conceived. The aim of the CPAr trial is to evaluate feasibility and safety of Ar/O2 ventilation in patients resuscitated from CA. Activity endpoints will be also evaluated to assess effects of Ar.
Full description
The trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single blinded, phase I and pre marketing study in patients resuscitated from Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The adoption of a randomized design in a phase I trial aiming at a safety assessment of a new ventilation mixture in a very critical population is justified and necessary in the absence of reliably comparable populations on which to base estimates of a potential excess of adverse events/side effects.
All eligible patients will be treated in full and documented compliance with the European ResuscitationCouncil (ERC)/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (international guidelines and local post resuscitation protocols). Since a reliable estimate of the incidence and characteristics of the clinical events assumed as endpoints is not available in the literature, a randomized assignment is the only way to ensure a strict comparability for both the periods of data collection of safety end points (to be assessed blindly by the events Committee), the four hours of duration of study treatment, and the longer period of possibly related clinical events during 6 months follow up.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
50 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Lidia Staszewsky, MD; Antonella Vasamì
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal