ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Carotid Artery Plaque Vulnerability Assessment Using Ultrafast Ultrasound Techniques (CAP-VALUE)

R

Radboud University Medical Center

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Carotid Artery Plaque

Treatments

Other: Biospecimen collection and examination
Diagnostic Test: Carotid ultrasound
Other: Blood sample collection

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Objective: To explore the association between spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis, and post-stenosis) and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Secondary, to assess the association between ultrasound elastography and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Furthermore, to assess the association between blood flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress (WSS), vector complexity and vorticity, and plaque vulnerability. To evaluate the hemodynamic consequences of a CEA. Last, to explore whether the presence of circulating biomarkers is related to the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound).

Study design: A multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study in a total of 70 patients.

Study population: Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.

Intervention (observational): A carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care. The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure. Besides, clinical parameters will be subtracted from electronic health record or, if missing, anamnestically collected from the patient.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, maximum stenosis and post-stenosis), measured by ultrafast ultrasound measurements, and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining.

Enrollment

70 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of carotid artery stenosis (≥50%) according to conventional clinically performed imaging (duplex/CT(A)/MR(A)) and scheduled for a CEA;
  • Possibility to perform carotid ultrasound ≤2 weeks before the CEA
  • ≥18 years old;
  • Able to provide signed or oral informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Hampered carotid blood flow imaging during clinically performed duplex/doppler measurements due to near to total carotid occlusion at the side of interest or a calcified plaque;
  • Restenosis after carotid revascularisation at side of interest;
  • Participating in another clinical study, interfering on outcomes;

Trial design

70 participants in 1 patient group

Participants
Description:
Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.
Treatment:
Other: Blood sample collection
Other: Biospecimen collection and examination
Diagnostic Test: Carotid ultrasound

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems