Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
A recent randomized Carotid artery stenting (CAS) trial in which carotid protection device (CPD)s were used to demonstrate equivalence with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by achieving noninferiority regarding periprocedural risk. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of CPDs are still a matter of controversy. It has been argued that the limited reduction provided by CPDs may be due to the devices themselves. Probably, they serve as sources for emboli during the procedure or removal technique. In general, 30- day adverse outcome for CAS with the use of CPDs seems not to be different from the outcome without CPDs.
Thus, the main goal in this study is to test the hypothesis that CAS without CPD usage is as safe as in those patients who undergo CAS with CPD neuroprotection.
Full description
The Carotid Artery Stenting without Embolic Protection (CASWEP) trial is designed in a prospective, randomized, multi-center fashion to determine if CAS without CPD is feasible and safe in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis.
Study participants After the exclusion criterias were applied 279 patients were divided as 139 patients in the CAS with CPD arm and 140 patients in the CAS without CPD arm. Our study population includes patients with severe carotid artery stenosis referred to the 3 study center hospitals.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
279 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal