Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The research study seeks to refine and test a brief, self-directed, intervention for individuals from the general public with PTSD and co-occurring HD that can be delivered via text-messaging. This application seeks to refine the intervention further by testing whether theoretically-driven, evidence-based strategies from basic cognitive psychology (message framing) and social psychology (facilitating growth mindsets) result in better outcomes for PTSD symptoms and HD by addressing pilot participant feedback related to avoidance and motivation.
Full description
This study will refine a previously piloted text message intervention by integrating and testing the efficacy of behavioral nudge and psychologically-wise intervention techniques when added to CBT text messages for reducing hazardous drinking (HD) and PTSD symptoms.The enhancements will be tested in a fully crossed 3 (message framing: avoid losses vs. maximize gains vs. no framing) x 2 (mindsets: facilitate growth mindset reminder vs. simple reminder to use skills) factorial design to identify the most effective combination of text messages. A sample of 500 participants with DSM-5 Criterion A trauma exposure, PTSD symptoms, and HD will be enrolled and randomized to condition. Baseline, immediate post-, 1-, and 3-month assessments will capture change in primary outcomes (PTSD, hazardous drinking).
Trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms will be assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, Civilian Version DSM-5 with the Life Events Checklist (PCL-5 and LEC).
HD will be assessed via a set of measures that provide a detailed picture of drinking patterns. First, two questions will ask about heavy episodic drinking (HED: 4/5 or more drinks per single occasion for men/women) episodes, assessing both frequency over the lifetime and frequency over the last month. Typical weekly alcohol consumption will also be assessed using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ). Negative alcohol-related consequences will be assessed via the Short Index of Problems (SIP).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
505 participants in 6 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Michele Bedard-Gilligan, PhD; Ty Tristao
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal