ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Central Incisors Narrow Implants in Alternative to Bone Augmentation With 4.2 mm Implants .

A

Alpha-Bio Tec

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 4

Conditions

Upper Central Incisor Edentulism

Treatments

Device: ICE dental implant 4.2 mm
Device: Alpha Bio's Graft resorbable membrane
Device: NICE dental implant 3.2 mm
Device: Alpha Bio's Graft Bovine bone

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT02897193
ABT-ME-130815

Details and patient eligibility

About

Horizontal bone augmentation procedures are commonly used to increase bone width to allow the placement of dental implants or to improve aesthetics in deficient areas. Smaller diameter implants could be used instead in order to avoid bone augmentation procedures.

The comparison between these two solutions will be evaluated in the trial.

Enrollment

42 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Upper central incisor edentulism
  • bone width between 3.5-4.5 mm
  • requirement of only one implant supported crown
  • patient is willing to sign an informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • General contraindications to implant surgery.
  • Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients
  • Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Addiction to alcohol or drugs.
  • Untreated periodontal disease.
  • Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-biphosphonates.
  • Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
  • Psychiatric problems and/or unrealistic expectations.
  • Acute infection (abscess) or suppuration in the area intended for implant placement.
  • Patients referred only for implant placement if cannot be followed at the treatment centre.
  • Patient unable to attend the follow-up controls for 3 years after implant loading.
  • Patient included in other studies, if this protocol cannot be properly followed.
  • Immediate post-extractive sites (to be eligible at least 3 months must have passed since extraction).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

42 participants in 2 patient groups

Dental implant with bone augmentation
Active Comparator group
Description:
patients will be installed with ICE Dental implant 4.2 mm diameter with Alpha-Bio's grafts horizontal bone augmentation
Treatment:
Device: Alpha Bio's Graft resorbable membrane
Device: Alpha Bio's Graft Bovine bone
Device: ICE dental implant 4.2 mm
narrow implant
Experimental group
Description:
patients will be installed with NICE Dental implant 3.2 mm diameter
Treatment:
Device: NICE dental implant 3.2 mm

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems