Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
In Kenya, the chamas strategy (a peer support approach aimed at improving MNCH and reducing gender and social inequalities) has been shown to significantly improve maternal and child health outcomes while also providing social and financial support to participating women. However, the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in women's work and MNCH services around the world due to reallocation of health care resources, COVID-19 fears, transportation restrictions, and lockdowns. These consequences appeared to disproportionately affect the poor, particularly poor women. The purpose of this participatory action design study is to determine how Chamas participation intersected with other factors to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health and economic well-being of women and children.
Full description
The study objectives are:
To evaluate the effect of Chama participation on mitigating the effects of the pandemic on social and gender equity.
To use an equity-centered design process and narrative approach to share research findings.
The research team intends to evaluate women's experiences during the pandemic using a mixed method approach and a participatory action design method. The focus will be on 3 study cohorts: (1) women who participated in Chamas throughout the pandemic, (2) women who left Chamas during the pandemic, (3) women whose communities were randomized to not receive the Chamas intervention. To better understand the effects of Chama participation on study outcomes, we will conduct an interviewer-administered survey among the described cohorts of women. This will be followed by qualitative studies to contextualize the study findings and investigate gender dynamics as social processes. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (KIIs) will be conducted to further investigate our study cohort's experiences during the pandemic and identify strategies used by participants to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic and its associated restrictions.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
444 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal