Chemerin and IL-6 Levels in Diabetes and Periodontitis

Bulent Ecevit University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Diabetes Mellitus; Chronic Periodontitis

Treatments: Other: non-surgical periodontal treatment

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02596581

2014-116-17-06

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aims of the present study were to determine the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) chemerin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and to analyse the relationship between chemerin and IL-6 in periodontal health and in chronic periodontitis (CP) with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as to evaluate the effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy on the GCF chemerin levels.

Full description

Adipose tissue is an active endocrine organ that secretes several inflammatory cytokines, namely, adipokines, which interfere with insulin sensitivity, with glucose and lipid metabolism, and with the inflammatory process.Chemerin, a more recently identified adipose tissue specific adipokine, has a crucial role in adipocyte differentiation and development, as well as in glucose, lipid metabolism and inflammation. Experimental data supports both pro- and anti-inflammatory roles for chemerin in immune cells. Therefore, it is not clear whether chemerin contributes more to the progression of inflammation or the resolution.The present investigation has been devoted to elucidate the role of chemerin in the pathogenesis that might link between DM and periodontal disease. We hypothesize that chemerin may hold value as an inflammatory mediator in CP patients with and without T2DM and non-surgical periodontal treatment could have a beneficial influence on the levels of chemerin.

The aim of this study were:

1. to determine the role of chemerin in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease and DM via comparing with GCF levels of IL-6, which has a known proinflammatory effect in periodontal disease and DM
2. to evaluate the effect of non-surgical periodontal treatment on GCF chemerin levels in periodontitis patients with and without T2DM.

The study included eighty subjects: 20 subjects with systemically and periodontally healthy (CTRL group), 20 patients with T2DM and periodontally healthy (DM-CTRL group), 20 patients with systemically healthy and CP (CP group), 20 patients with CP and T2DM (DM-CP group). Periodontitis patients received nonsurgical periodontal therapy. GCF sampling and clinical periodontal parameters were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks after periodontal therapy. Chemerin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and their relative ratios were calculated.

Subjects were clinically evaluated using the following parameters; plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) , PD, clinical attachment level (CAL) and BOP (deemed positive if it occurred within 15 seconds after probing). Clinical measurements were recorded by one calibrated examiner at six sites per tooth from the full-mouth teeth excluding third molars using with a Williams periodontal probe (Nordent Manufacturing Inc., ElkGrove Village, IL, USA) calibrated in millimeters. Anthropometric measurements included weight (kg) and height (m) of the subjects to calculate the BMI ( weight divided by the square of height, kg/m2 ).

All clinical and radiological examinations, sampling site selections were performed by one examiner and the samples were collected on the day after clinical examination of patients. This was to prevent contamination of GCF with blood associated with the probing of inflamed sites. The deepest two pocket sites of single-rooted teeth were selected for the collection of GCF in both periodontitis groups, and also two pocket sites with an absence of inflammation were sampled to ensure the collection of an adequate amount of GCF in control groups. In patients from CP and DM-CP groups, sites showing greatest PD when measured with a periodontal probes and signs of inflammation, along with radiographic conformation of bone loss were sampled. GCF samples were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks from baseline sampling in both periodontitis groups, and only at baseline in control groups. To avoid salivary contamination, the sites to be sampled were rinsed with water, isolated by cotton rolls and gently air dried. Paper strips (Periopaper; Oraflow Inc.,Smithtown, NY, USA) were gently inserted 1-2 mm into the sulcus/pocket for 30 seconds. Care was taken to avoid mechanical injury of the gingival tissues. All samples containing blood and saliva were discarded. The two strips from two sites of each individual were placed into coded sealed plastic eppendorf tubes and pooled before freezing at -80 degree

Enrollment: 80 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 35 to 60 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Diabetic subjects should have T2DM and had no any known systemic diseases other than T2DM
• Subjects who had HbA1c levels < 8% and ≥ 6.5% (well and moderate control)
• Chronic periodontitis patients had radiographic evidence of bone loss and attachment loss with a minimum of 6 teeth having pocket probing depth (PD) ≥ 5mm in at least 2 different quadrants
• Control groups were designed as healthy if the full-mouth probing depth (PD) was ≤3mm and bleeding on probing (BOP) score < %15 at examination and they had no radiographic evidence of alveolar bone loss.

Exclusion criteria

• Presence of other systemic disorders that could influence the course of periodontal disease; pregnancy, lactation, current and former use of tobacco;
• Administration of non-steroidal and anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotic therapies within the previous 6 months;
• Need for antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment and having received non-surgical periodontal treatment within the past 6 months or surgical periodontal treatment within the past 12 months.
• Subjects who had body mass index (BMI) >24.9 kg /m2

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Non-Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

80 participants in 4 patient groups

diabetics with periodontally healthy group

No Intervention group

Description:

Control group

systemically and periodontally healthy group

No Intervention group

Description:

Control group

diabetics with chronic periodontitis group

Active Comparator group

Description:

non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed

Treatment:

Other: non-surgical periodontal treatment

chronic periodontitis group

Active Comparator group

Description:

non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed

Treatment:

Other: non-surgical periodontal treatment