ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Chlorhexidine vs Lactobacillus Plantarum for Oral Care in Intubated ICU Patients

R

Region Skane

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Pathogenic Bacteria in the Oropharynx

Treatments

Procedure: Lactobacillus plantarum 299 for oral care
Procedure: Chlorhexidine for standard oral care

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT01105819
PROHYG 1B

Details and patient eligibility

About

Critically ill patients often need ventilatory support through a plastic tube connected to a ventilator. Those patients have a altered microbiological flora in the mouth, oropharynx as well as throughout the intestine. Bacteria that can cause illness are often found in the oropharynx in such patients and measures are taken in order to reduce the risk of secondary infections by those bacteria. In all intensive care patients oral care is provided by the nursing staff aiming at a reduction of the pathogenic species. This is done by a variety measures.

Chlorhexidine (CHX) is an antisepticum with a capability to reduce bacterial counts in the mouth and oropharynx and has been shown to be of value also for intubated patients. It is used frequently throughout the world.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a costly rather frequent complication to intensive care and mechanical ventilation and is usually caused by aspiration of infected secretions from the oropharynx. CHX has in some studies been shown to reduce the frequency of VAP.

The probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 299 has the ability to adhere to the mucosa throughout the gastro-intestinal tract including the mouth and in our pilot study we found that L plantarum had better ability to reduce colonisation with enteric bacteria in the oropharynx than CHX had. Figures not statistical significant so this present study is aiming to get a larger amount of data.

The procedure was found to be safe Hypothesis: Lactobacillus plantarum is better than CHX for the reduction of pathogenic bacteria in the oropharynx in intubated mechanically ventilated patients and consequently has a better potential to reduce the frequency of VAP

Full description

This study is an expansion of a pilot study performed at the ICU Lund University Hospital, Sweden where 50 patients were included (ISRCTN00472141).

Results have been published in Critical Care 2008, 12:R136 The protocol is the same and in this second phase we intend to include 100 patients and results will be summed up.

Three centres are engaged. The results from the pilot study is encouraging and we are aiming at getting statistical significance in the differences in pathogenic findings in the cultures from oropharynx and also better a better basis for the calculation of the number of patients needed to get sufficient power to study difference in VAP frequency.

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Critically ill patients anticipated to require mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

  • Pneumonia as admission diagnosis,
  • Fractures on the facial skeleton or the skull base;
  • Known ulcers in the oral cavity, the oropharynx, or the esophagus
  • Known immune difficency
  • Carrier of HIV or Hepatitis
  • Patient being moribund

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard oral care with chlorhexidine
Other group
Description:
The control group will receive a standard oral care. This includes suction of secretions, brushing of teeth cleansing of the oral cavity with swabs soaked with a chlorhexidine solution. This procedure is performed twice a day. In between, suction whenever needed and cleansing with swabs soaked with carbonated bottled water is performed
Treatment:
Procedure: Chlorhexidine for standard oral care
Lactobacillus plantarum 299
Active Comparator group
Description:
The study group will be attended in the same manor but the swabs used for cleansing are soaked with carbonated water directly from freshly opened bottles. As the final part of the procedure oral mucosal surfaces are pencilled with a suspension of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 299 Cultures from the oropharynx and tracheal secretions are taken at inclusion (day 1) and then on days 2,3,5,7,10,14 and 21 or before extubation if this occurs on a non-culture day
Treatment:
Procedure: Lactobacillus plantarum 299 for oral care

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems