ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Chlorhexidine vs Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solutions for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infection

P

Poitiers University Hospital

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

ICU Patients Requiring a Central Venous Access

Treatments

Drug: Skin disinfection

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00259350
Anticath

Details and patient eligibility

About

The best antiseptic solution for cateheter care remains unknown.High concentration in aquous solution or low concentration in alcoholic solution of chlorhexidine actbetter than povidone iodine in aquous solutions. No study has compare alcoholic formulations of low concentration of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine for skin disinfection prior to insertion of central venous catheters.

To compare the incidence of central venous catheter colonization after skin disinfection with either an alcoholic solution of povidone iodine or a combination of 0.5% chlorhexidine, 0.025% Benzalkonium and 4% benzylic alcohol.

To compare the incidence of catheter related bacteremia in the to study groups. To compare the local and general tolerance of the two antiseptic formulations

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 yeras of age
  • Requiring an internal jugular or sub-clavian central venous catheter for their care during at least 72 h
  • Informed consent signed up

Exclusion criteria

  • Bacteriemic infection not under control
  • extensive cutaneous infection
  • Women with childbearing potential

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems