ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Chronicle Offers Management to Patients With Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure (COMPASS-HF)

Medtronic logo

Medtronic

Status

Completed

Conditions

Heart Failure

Treatments

Other: Standard of Care
Device: Chronicle Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT00643279
COMPASS-HF

Details and patient eligibility

About

COMPASS-HF was a prospective, two-arm, randomized (1:1), multi-center, parallel controlled study. The purpose of the randomized study was to test the safety of an implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM) and pressure sensor lead. The premise of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a novel heart failure management strategy based on information obtained from the IHM system in reducing heart failure morbidity compared to a strategy based on standard medical care alone.

Full description

COMPASS-HF was a prospective, two-arm, randomized (1:1), multi-center, parallel controlled study. The purpose of the randomized study was to test the safety of an implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM) and pressure sensor lead. The premise of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a novel heart failure management strategy based on information obtained from the IHM system in reducing heart failure morbidity compared to a strategy based on standard medical care alone.

After baseline evaluation and verification that entrance criteria were met, all subjects were implanted with a Chronicle IHM and pressure sensor lead. Following successful implantation, subjects were randomized to either the CHRONICLE group or CONTROL group. Subjects randomized to the CHRONICLE group were managed using Chronicle, specifically trended RV and estimated PA pressure, heart rate and activity data, whereas subjects randomized to the CONTROL group were treated conventionally without the use of the Chronicle data. In the case that implantation was not successful, subjects were exited from the study if no procedure related adverse events were identified; procedure related adverse events were followed through to resolution before the subject were withdrawn from the study.

Subjects remained randomized until their six month clinic visit had been completed. Following the subject's six month visit, clinicians were granted access to the CONTROL subject's trended Chronicle data on the Chronicle website, and subjects were seen in the clinic for a protocol-required visit every six months until exit from the study.

Enrollment

277 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with heart failure classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III and IV
  • Subject has been managed with standard medical therapy for heart failure (such as diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and beta-blocker for at least 3 months prior to the baseline evaluation
  • Subject must have at least one heart failure-related hospitalization or emergency department visit requiring intravenous treatment within 6 months prior to baseline evaluation

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects who are likely to be transplanted within 6 months from randomization or will remain hospitalized until transplantation
  • Subjects with severe COPD or restrictive airway disease (recommended FEV1 less than or equal to 1 liter or 50% predicted)
  • Subjects who are on continuous positive inotropic therapy
  • Subjects with known atrial or ventricular septal defects
  • Subjects with mechanical right heart valves
  • Subjects with stenotic tricuspid or pulmonary valves
  • Subjects with a presently implanted non-compatible pacemaker or ICD
  • Subjects with cardiac resynchronization therapy which has not achieved optimal programming for more than 3 months
  • Subjects with a major cardiovascular event within 3 months prior to baseline evaluation
  • Subjects with a severe non-cardiac condition limiting 6 month survival
  • Subjects with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension
  • Subjects with serum creatinine greater than or equal to 3.5 mg/dL or on chronic renal dialysis
  • Subjects enrolled in concurrent studies that may confound the results of this study
  • Women who are pregnant or with child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

277 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

CHRONICLE
Experimental group
Description:
Subjects randomized to the CHRONICLE group were managed using data from an implantable hemodynamic monitoring (IHM) device, including trended right ventricular (RV) and estimated pulmonary arterial (PA) pressures, heart rate and activity data. The Chronicle IHM device does not provide therapy, but rather provides intracardiac diagnostic information about the patient which the physician can utilize to manage the patient and the patients heart failure.
Treatment:
Device: Chronicle Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor
CONTROL
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Subjects randomized to the CONTROL group implanted with the Chronicle implantable hemodynamic monitoring (IHM) device, but the intracardiac diagnostic information was blinded to both the patient and the physician during the randomized period of the study. Subjects were managed conventionally with standard of care. Physicians and patients have access to the intracardiac data after the randomized period of the study is over, at 6 months.
Treatment:
Other: Standard of Care

Trial contacts and locations

28

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems