Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This trial will evaluate whether the sequential administration of Cisplatin/Vinorelbine/Bevacizumab followed by Docetaxel/Gemcitabine/Bevacizumab versus the Cisplatin/Docetaxel/Bevacizumab combination as first line treatment offers a survival advantage in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Full description
An unanswered question in first line treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is whether the administration of more than 2 active drugs provides greater efficacy than a two-drug combination. Docetaxel/gemcitabine combination is a well tolerated regimen, which has comparable efficacy to docetaxel/cisplatin or vinorelbine/cisplatin. In a recent phase II study in first line treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC, the sequential administration of vinorelbine/cisplatin followed by docetaxel/gemcitabine produced a response rate of 45.8% and a 1-year survival rate of 51%. The addition of bevacizumab to a platinum-based regimen provided a survival benefit in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Histologically confirmed, unresectable locally advanced (stage IIIB with pleural effusion) or metastatic (stage IV) non-squamous NSCLC
Performance status (WHO) 0-1
Adequate bone marrow (ANC ≥ 1,500/mm3, PLT ≥ 100,000/mm3, Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL), liver (Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 UNL, SGOT/SGPT ≤ 2.5 UNL, ALP ≤ 5 UNL), and renal function (Creatinine ≤ UNL - if borderline, creatinine clearance should be ≥ 60 mL/min)
No previous chemotherapy or immunotherapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC is allowed
--Previous radiotherapy is allowed provided that the measurable lesions are outside the radiation fields
Measurable disease, defined as at least 1 bidimensionally measurable lesion ≥ 20 X 10 mm
Patient able to take oral medication
Absence of active CNS disease
Paraffin embedded sample of primary or metastatic tumor diagnostic specimen must be available
Patients must be able to understand the nature of this study and give written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
77 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal