ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Clinical and Histomorphometric Analysis of Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Mucogingival Surgery in Orthodontic Patients

E

Elena Ruiz de Gopegui Palacios

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Treatments

Other: autologous connective tissue graft
Device: Collagen matrix

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

There are some orthodontics treatments that perform risk movements ,and a bone dehiscence may be expected. In that cases mucogingival surgery , such as connective tissue grafts, is necessary prior to tooth movement.

The connective tissue graft in combination with coronal advanced flap is still considered the gold standard , although the use of porcine collagen matrix has obtained promising results for treatment of Miller class I and II recession defects.

Most of the studies report clinical results after a connective tissue graft and there is no evidence about the type of attachment obtained after the graft is performed, a few articles have shown histological results. But, as a rule , a histological study is only performed under exceptional circumstances such as a dental fracture, untreatable decay, tooth extraction for orthodontic reasons, or other reasons.

Most of the techniques results in the formation of a long junctional epithelium and connective tissue attachment with fibers parallel to the root surface. Animals studies have shown a shorter epithelium and a larger new cementum formation after the use of the collagen matrix.

Full description

The purpose of this study is to confirm that periodontal regeneration happens after mucogingival surgery The principal outcome is compare the millimeters of new attachment create after a connective tissue graft and after the use of a porcine collagen matrix in teeth that have to been extracted (because of the orthodontic planing treatment) after mucogingival surgery .

The secondary outcomes are:

  1. length of new cementum (histometry results)
  2. length of the junctional epithelium (histometry results)
  3. length of connective tissue attachment (histometry results)
  4. complete root coverage (clinical results)
  5. width of keratinized tissue

Enrollment

5 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient in orthodontic treatment ,who needs mucogingival surgery in both hemi arcade and later the tooth adjacent to the graft should be extracted because of the orthodontic planing treatment .
  • The patient must be 18 years or older
  • Patient shows sufficient plaque control (FMPS < 20%).
  • The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and is able to provide a signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatment are present.
  • The patient is taking medications or having treatments which have an effect on mucosal healing in general (e.g. steroids, large doses of anti-inflammatory drugs).
  • Untreated periodontal conditions
  • Patients not willing to participate

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

5 participants in 2 patient groups

Autologous connective tissue graft
Active Comparator group
Description:
Soft tissue harvesting from patient palate
Treatment:
Other: autologous connective tissue graft
collagen matrix
Experimental group
Description:
Mucograft collagen matrix manufactured by Geistlich AG, Switzerland Device: Collagen matrix
Treatment:
Device: Collagen matrix

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ana Maria Garcia de la Fuente; Elena Ruiz de Gopegui

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems