Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study evaluates the clinical benefit of a rapid test for fast diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia from positive blood cultures in case of sepsis. This assay enables rapid identification of bacteria and fungi and allows to evaluate bacterial resistance to first line antibiotics. The clinical and medico-economic impact of this assay used in addition to the current diagnosis strategy (half of the patients) will be compared to the current diagnostic strategy alone (other half of the patient).
Full description
Bacteremia and fungemia are severe complications, sometimes life-threatening, of every sepsis. During septicemia, every hour matters to start an appropriate antibiotic or antifungal treatment as every hour of delay is associated to higher death rate.
The rapid multiplex PCR assay that is evaluated in this study allows to identify in 60 to 90 minutes, the bacteria or fungi that is present in the positive blood culture bottles and to identify resistance markers to first line antibiotics that are used to treat sepsis. This strategy allows quicker adaptation of antibacterial or antifungal treatment based on the species of the bacteria or fungi identified and on the results of the resistance markers compared to current diagnosis strategy of bacteremia or fungemia. This quicker adaptation could lead to improved survival rate, reduced complications of sepsis, reduced hospital stay length and could reduce the use of large spectrum antibiotics.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patient with bacteremia and/or fungemia defined by :
1/ the presence of clinical signs of sepsis; AND 2/ a positive blood culture, i.e. the growth of at least one species of bacteria or micromyces in at least one blood culture vial
Patient Hospitalized at Grenoble University Hospital (only North site) and seen by a physician from the antibiotic stewardship team
First blood culture positive for the patient's sepsis episode
Informed and written consent signed by the patient or his legal representative or the doctor in case of emergency.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
312 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal