Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The main objective of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of the ABC4D compared to standard therapy (standard bolus calculator) in adults with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin in an out-of-clinic setting.
Hypothesis: ABC4D is non-inferior to a standard bolus calculator and has an equivalent impact on time in target in adults with type 1 diabetes on MDI
Full description
The novel decision support algorithm is based on case-based reasoning (CBR). CBR is an artificial intelligence technique that tries to solve newly encountered problems by applying the solutions learned from solved problems encountered in the past (10).
The CBR algorithm requires the following input for each insulin dose recommendation:
The insulin recommendation application runs locally on a standard operating system such as iOs5.x or Android within a commercially available smartphone. It contains the CBR based decision support algorithm as well as information of past successful cases. Opening the decision support application on the smartphone leads to the main menu, which provides a link to the submenu for requesting a new recommendation. Every calculated recommendation needs to be accepted or declined manually, and the latter option requires the user to enter the adjusted amount of insulin that has been delivered. In addition, the main menu enables the user to view logged data such as recent glucose levels, meal/exercise events and previous insulin dose advices.
The glucose sensors that will be used throughout the clinical validation studies are the Enlite sensor (CE marked,manufactured by Medtronic) or the Dexcom sensor (CE marked, manufactured by Dexcom). They are subcutaneous sensor which sit just under the skin and sample interstitial fluid using an enzyme electrode. A small voltage is applied across the sensor and a current is fed back to the sensor instrumentation. This current is proportional to the glucose concentration in interstitial fluid and is calibrated against blood glucose a minimum of 12-hourly. In phase 2 and 3 the CGM will be blinded and either calibrated retrospectively using the iPro2 system (CE marked, manufactured by Medtronic) or calibrated in real-time using the Dexcom CGM system (however the CGM will be blinded to the subject). The iPro2 consist of a recorder that will be attached to the Enlite sensor and at the end of 6 days the data will be downloaded to the Medtronic Carelink iPro software. The Dexcom CGM data will be downloaded to the DiaSend/Dexcom Studio software. In phase 4 Dexcom real-time CGM (i.e subjects will be able to see their CGM data at all times) will be used continuously throughout the study. In Phase 5 the latest commercially available version of the Dexcom RT-CGM (Dexcom G6) will be used in accordance with manufacturer's user guide and data will automatically be stored to Dexcom Clarity. All data will be anonymised. The non-CE marked component of the intervention (The ABC4D device which is a novel bolus calculator for type 1 diabetes) remains the same and any adjustments to the algorithm will be documented with new version numbers as usual. The latest commercially available version of the Dexcom RT-CGM (Dexcom G6) will be used and this has got CE-mark approval. Two additional components to automatically collect additional information will be used in Phase 5:
Insulin pen caps allow automatic logging insulin doses delivered from the insulin pen. The participant will be provided with the pen cap that is compatible with their insulin pen.
InPen (Companion Medical). The InPen is a CE-marked device. GoCap (Common Sensing). The GoCap is classed as a non-medical device and therefore does not require CE-mark in Europe.
FitBit Charge 2 HR (Fitbit) to collect physical activity data. The Fitbit Charge 2 HR is classed as a non-medical device.
An overview of the components of the ABC4D system for Phase 5 has been included in the Phase 5 section of the protocol and in the corresponding PIS.
In order to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the CBR algorithm, an in-silico study using the UVa-Padova T1DM simulator (11) was done and showed good results. The simulator was developed from human data and takes into account sensor errors, sensor placement, route of insulin administration and meal-time glucose absorption.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
37 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Monika Reddy
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal