Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study was to investigate the overall clinical comfort performance of enfilcon A (test) lens and senofilcon A (control) lens over 15-minutes of lens wear.
Full description
This was a non-dispensing, single-masked, randomized, contralateral study comparing Enfilcon A (test) against Senofilcon A (control). Each subject was randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other eye.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health.
Be 18 to 38 years old.
Be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluation.
Read, indicate understanding of, and sign Written Informed Consent.
Be existing or successfully adapted users of soft contact lenses, but not currently wearing either of the study lenses (Avaira or Oasys) being evaluated in this trial.
Require a visual correction in both eyes.
Require a prescription between +8.00D and -12.00D and have less than or equal to 0.75D of astigmatism in both eyes.
Achieve visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye with a spherical contact lens prescription.
Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
Exclusion criteria
0.75D or greater of refractive astigmatism in either eye.
Presbyopic or current monovision contact lens wear.
Cannot be currently wearing either lenses (Avaira or Oasys).
Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammation such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
Contact Lens best corrected Snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 20/30.
Aphakia, Keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal