ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Clinical Decision Tree Analysis of Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Choices and Creations - a Multiple-center Retrospective Cohort Study

National Taiwan University logo

National Taiwan University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Decision Tree Analysis

Treatments

Other: No intervention

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06364449
202309052RIND

Details and patient eligibility

About

Our study aim was to utilize a decision tree analysis (DTA) model to gain insight into the decision-making process within a multiple-center cohort.

Full description

Scientific research focuses on limited parameters, aims to confirm hypotheses, and has minor uncertainties. In contrast, medical decisions involve many unknowns. Physicians must use all available knowledge to make the best decisions. However, decision-making can become unpredictable when limited evidence exists, leading to non-reproducible outcomes.

According to clinical guidelines, patients who need pre-kidney replacement therapy (pre-KRT) and opt for hemodialysis (HD) with a reasonable life expectancy should have arteriovenous (AV) access created. Nevertheless, constructing an AVF has limitations. [Additionally, the maturation rate of AVF is suboptimal. Therefore, after careful consideration of the patient's end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) life plan, the suggested order of AV access types and locations starts a native distal forearm radiocephalic AVF, followed by a native proximal forearm AVF, a forearm arteriovenous graft (AVG), then an upper arm AVG creation.[Lok et al., 2020] However, the decision-making process for selecting hemodialysis access is shared between patients, physicians, and the surgeon's discretion.

Therefore, clinical kidney practice requires effective decision-making to address ESKD life plan and AV access concerns while minimizing harm. Decision analysis models can bridge the gap between research and decision-making. Our study aim was to utilize a decision tree analysis (DTA) model to gain insight into the decision-making process within a multiple-center cohort.

Enrollment

600 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 100 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients between the ages of 18 and 80 who were referred for primary hemodialysis (HD) AV access creation. We included those in the pre-kidney replacement therapy (pre-KRT) stage and those who in the early end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) urgently started HD without sufficient time to plan for AV access

Exclusion criteria

  • patients who underwent a secondary AV access surgery, like a transposed radiobasilic AVF or a revision of AVG.

Trial design

600 participants in 4 patient groups

AVF-wrist
Treatment:
Other: No intervention
AVF-elbow
Treatment:
Other: No intervention
AVG-forearm
Treatment:
Other: No intervention
AVG-elbow
Treatment:
Other: No intervention

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Chih-Yang Chan, phd

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems