Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to evaluate and compare the degree of alcohol reduction between high-risk drinkers who use a motivational interviewing-based conversational agent (chatbot) application for four weeks and those in the control group who do not use the application, in order to verify its clinical effectiveness.
Full description
"This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) employing a waitlist control design to examine the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing-based conversational mobile application for high-risk drinkers.
After obtaining voluntary written consent, participants will complete a screening process that includes a clinical interview (MINI, DSM) and demographic data collection. Those who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (n = 110) or the control group (n = 110).
For the intervention group, the total study period is 16 weeks and consists of three visits (week 0, 4, and 16). The control group will participate for 20 weeks and complete four visits (week 0, 4, 16, and 20). The final follow-up assessment for both groups will be conducted via telephone and online.
The intervention group will use the mobile app (chatbot) for 4 weeks beginning on the baseline assessment day (Visit 1). Re-assessments will be conducted at week 4 (Visit 2), marking the end of the intervention period, and again at week 16 (Visit 3), which occurs three months after the intervention.
The control group will not receive any intervention from baseline to week 16 and will complete the same reassessments at week 4 (Visit 2) and week 16 (Visit 3). After the week 16 assessment, the control group will also use the mobile app for 4 weeks and undergo a final evaluation at week 20 (Visit 4), following completion of their intervention period.
This waitlist control design allows for a rigorous comparison of outcomes between the two groups while ensuring that all participants eventually receive access to the intervention, supporting both ethical considerations and improved retention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
220 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal