ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Low Speed Drilling
Implant Stability

Treatments

Procedure: Biological drilling osteotomy protocol
Procedure: Conventional drilling osteotomy protocol

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06992557
mazenmostafasayedali@@15121987

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to evaluate the effect of biological drilling osteotomy protocol compared to conventional osteotomy protocol in delayed implant placement in the posterior mandible regarding implant stability Type of study design: Randomized Clinical Trial In patient indicated for delayed implant placement in the lower posterior mandible will the use of biological drilling protocol osteotomy compared to conventional drilling protocol osteotomy differ regarding implant stability at three months?

Enrollment

28 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

21 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Systemically healthy male and female patients, aged 21 to 60 years old,
  • Indicated for delayed implant placement in the posterior mandibular arch.
  • Good oral health.
  • Willingness to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Heavy smoker (> 10 cigarettes/day)
  • Pregnant females
  • Contraindication for Implant surgery.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene.
  • A history of radiotherapy in the head or neck region.
  • Patients with systemic disease like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, coagulation disorders, alcohol or drug abuse not suitable for implantation.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

28 participants in 2 patient groups

Biological drilling osteotomy protocol
Experimental group
Description:
* Local infiltration anesthesia will be applied to all the patients participating in this study. * Full thickness mucoperiosteal flap reflection with 15c blade. * Osteotomy site preparation through sequential biologic drilling in healed bony site with a pilot drill at 800 rpm with irrigation initiates the drilling process, which is then followed by drills of different sizes and shapes at low speeds at 150rpm without irrigation. * The implant will be positioned in the osteotomy site and a healing collar will be placed. * The mucoperiosteal flap will be sutured in an interrupted manner with 5-0 proline suture material
Treatment:
Procedure: Biological drilling osteotomy protocol
Conventional drilling osteotomy protocol
Active Comparator group
Description:
* Local infiltration anesthesia will be applied to all the patients participating in this study. * Full thickness mucoperiosteal flap reflection with 15c blade. * Preparation for osteotomy site with conventional sequential drilling in healed bony site at 1200 rpm with irrigation. * The implant will be positioned in the osteotomy site and a healing collar will be placed. * The mucoperiosteal flap will be sutured in an interrupted manner with 5-0 proline suture material.
Treatment:
Procedure: Conventional drilling osteotomy protocol

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Mazen Mostafa, master in periodontology

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems