ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Clinical Evaluation of Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix for Reproduction of Proximal Contact

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Proximal Contact

Treatments

Device: Circumferential matrix and tofflemire retainer by Kerr
Device: MD ring and precontoured sectional matrix by TOR VM

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03795727
circumferential vs sectional

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different matricing techniques either sectional matrix or circumferential matrix on reproduction of optimum proximal contacts and contours during restoration of class II cavities with resin composite by undergraduate students or postgraduate dentists.

Enrollment

48 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 40 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Compound class II cavities
  • Good oral hygiene
  • No spacing or crowding
  • Healthy peridontium

Exclusion criteria

  • Complex class II cavities
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Spacing or crowding
  • Evidence of peridontal disease

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

48 participants in 2 patient groups

Sectional matrix
Experimental group
Description:
precontoured sectional matrix band
Treatment:
Device: MD ring and precontoured sectional matrix by TOR VM
Circumferential matrix
Active Comparator group
Description:
Circumferential matrix band applied by tofflemire retainer
Treatment:
Device: Circumferential matrix and tofflemire retainer by Kerr

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems