Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Edentulous patients commonly experience a deterioration in the quality of life; both in terms of oral and general health. Studies demonstrated that conventional dentures do not adequately restore masticatory function nor quality of life. In contrast, implant-supported overdentures are considered the standard of care for edentulous patients as they offer a more stable prosthesis that ultimately results in improved oral function and patient satisfaction.
Precision attachments such as studs, magnets, telescopic crowns or a bars are commonly used for implant supported overdentures. Implant overdentures supported by stud attachments gained popularity for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients as they are self-aligning, offer dual retention and compensate for divergence between implants up to angles of 40 degrees.
However, it has been documented that the stud attachment system (Locators) requires a high frequency of maintenance, particularly with regard to the replacement of the matrix.
In order to overcome some of these limitations of existing attachment systems, a newer system was developed consisting of a matrix made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) instead of a polymeric material. This system has an amorphous diamond like carbon-based abutment coating (ADLC) and it was claimed to be more resistant to wear.
Clinically and in vitro, no comparative studies have been performed addressing wear and retention of the traditional stud attachment and the newer ADLC attachment.
Thus, the aim of the present study is to clinically and in vitro evaluate the ADLC and study attachment system.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Impaired cognitive function and/or manual dexterity
Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
Unable to attend follow-up examinations
Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
Presence of any uncontrolled systematic disease that could compromise implant surgery and implant long-term performance
History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region
Heavy smoker (>10 cig. /day
Any potential allergies or hypersensitivity to chemical ingredients of material used
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
26 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal