Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of the study is to compare clinical benefits of the cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) achieved by the PEA optimised pacing configuration and a CRT optimised by standard clinical procedure.
PEA optimised configuration (PEA-CRT) is obtained, during patient's follow-up, using the Peak Endocardial Acceleration sensor features onboard the device.
Full description
The study is a prospective, multicentre, controlled and randomised clinical investigation, with two single-blinded arms.
The objective of the study is to compare the clinical benefits of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) optimised by automatic PEA sensor features (PEA-CRT), with those obtained by standard optimisation procedure (STD-CRT).
The patient candidate for inclusion in the study has a severe chronic Heart Failure, indicated for the implantation of a Biventricular pacing system according to updated ESC guidelines (2005).
All patients included in the study will be followed-up for 1 year; patient's follow-ups are scheduled during hospitalisation, at one month, 3 months, 6 months and one year after implantation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
The patient candidate for inclusion in the study must be indicated for implantation of a Biventricular pacing system, with the following clinical conditions:
Severe Heart Failure (NYHA Class III or IV)
Cardiomyopathy of any etiology
Sinus rhythm
Reduced Left-Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Left-Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter greater than or equal to 30 mm/m2 (LVEDD>30 mm/m2)
QRS Duration:
> 150 ms or
> 120 ms and documented Mechanical Dissynchrony (by ECHO) meeting two out of three of the following criteria:
Optimal and stable (1 month before inclusion) pharmacological treatment, including, if tolerated, Beta Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors or ACE Inhibitor substitutes, Spironolactone, and diuretics
Exclusion criteria
Any patient who has one of the following characteristics will be excluded from the study:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
310 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal