Clinical Outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in Endodontic Treatment

Mahidol University

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Clinical Outcome; Endodontic Disease

Treatments: Other: Calcium silicate cement

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04243993

MU-DT/PY-IRB 2016/052.0310

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare the endodontic outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair, endodontic microsurgery.

Full description

The patients were recruited at the Endodontic clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand. Each treatment was provided following the standard protocol. The calcium silicate based material (Bio-MA or ProRoot MTA) was randomly selected and used in the treatment. The patients were periodically recalled at 6 to 12 months. The outcome of the three treatments based on the clinical and radiographic criteria was assessed by the calibrated examiners and interpreted as ''healed/healing" or ''disease.''

Enrollment: 60 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 10 to 65 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Teeth treated with pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair or endodontic microsurgery

Exclusion criteria

• Teeth with un-restorable condition
• Teeth with crack or fracture
• Teeth with external or internal root resorption
• Teeth with chronic periodontitis with marginal bone loss more than 5 mm

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

60 participants in 2 patient groups

Bio-MA

Other group

Description:

Calcium silicate cement containing calcium chloride accelerator

Treatment:

Other: Calcium silicate cement

ProRoot MTA

Other group

Description:

Calcium silicate cement without calcium chloride accelerator

Treatment:

Other: Calcium silicate cement