Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will be conducted to assess the clinical performance and convenience of three types of crowns as esthetic alternatives to stainless steel crown for primary molars:
Full description
Eighty lower second primary molars will be divided into 4 groups:
Clinical and radiographic examination of the primary molar will be conducted to ensure compliance with the study criteria. Oral health instructions will be given to the child and parents then the application of local anesthesia.
Stainless steel crowns:
Reduction of occlusal surface by about 1.5 mm using a flame shaped diamond bur to produce a uniform occlusal reduction. Proximal reduction using a long and tapered diamond bur to allow the probe to pass through the contact area. An appropriate size will be selected according to mesiodistal width of the prepared tooth and a trial fit will be carried out before cementation. The crown should remain no more than 1 mm subgingivally.(21)
Zirconia and hybrid ceramic crowns:
The appropriate size of the posterior crown will be selected for the tooth chosen for treatment. The occlusal surface will be reduced by 1-2 mm by using a flame bur after evaluation of the occlusal relationships. The interproximal areas will be opened followed by reduction of the crown dimensions by 0.5-1.25 mm using a tapered diamond bur making the contour of the prepared tooth consistent with the natural contour. The prepared tooth walls will be finished with a 1-2 mm subgingival feather-edge preparation using a thinner pointed tapered diamond bur.
The selected crown will be tested for appropriate fit before the final cementation. Finally, the prepared tooth will be cleaned from saliva, blood, and the remnants of preparation and ready for cementation.(15) The selected crown will be cleaned and then filled with resin modified glass ionomer cement. The crown will be applied with no resistance to the fully seated position on the tooth (Passive Fit) since forcing the crown to place can produce micro-fractures in the zirconia structure. Excess cement will be removed using a dental probe and dental floss.
Clinical evaluation:
o Evaluation criteria concerning the clinical performance are
1= film at the gingival margin and adjacent tooth 2 = moderate accumulation of plaque 3 = abundance of plaque.
Crown retention (23) will be measured as follows:
0 = present.
1 = absent.
Crown integrity(24) will be measured as follows:
0 = intact.
Marginal adaptation will be measured clinically and radiographically:
Color stability(26) will be measured as follows:
0 = Unchanged.
1 = Minor deviation from original. Wear of the antagonistic natural enamel. To evaluate the wear of the antagonistic natural enamel of primary molar, a rubber base impressions will be made immediately (baseline) and at 1 year after cementation. The resulting casts will be scanned (using a 3D scanner), and 3D softare will be used to calculate the maximum amount of linear wear. (27)
o Evaluation criteria regarding the crown convenience: Time elapsed since the start of tooth preparation till the crown cementation. Anxiety using the Facial Image Scale (FIS).(28) The Facial image scale comprises a row of five faces ranging from very happy to very unhappy. The children were asked to point at which face they felt most like at that moment. The scale is scored by giving a value of one to the most positive affect face and five to the most negative affect face. Facial Image Scale has a fixed number of faces (not a continuous line) for the children to choose from, thus making it easier to score in a clinical situation, and easier for very young children to understand.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
80 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal