Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of Freedom For All Diagnostics, Inc.'s colloidal gold immune technology SARS-CoV-2 Antigen investigational assay when compared to a high-sensitivity Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay. The study will evaluate the accuracy in the intended use environment of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay when testing is conducted in a CLIA-waived setting (e.g., a physician's office or clinic) by non-laboratory personnel serving in a healthcare facility or setting.
Full description
The objective of this study is to demonstrate that non-laboratory personnel can accurately perform the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay in the intended use environment using nasopharyngeal samples by demonstrating that the assay can achieve a ≥ 80% sensitivity when it is compared to the results of a high sensitivity EUA SARSCoV-2 RT-PCR assay using nasopharyngeal samples. This study is designed as a prospective, blinded study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay when non-laboratory personnel conduct testing on Subjects presenting with symptoms of COVID-19.
A minimum of 30 positive and 30 negative samples are required in order to meet EUA submission guidelines. Enrollment will continue until both minimum requirements have been achieved.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Subject suspected of having COVID-19 infection and within 7 days of symptom onset. This will include at least one of the following:
In addition to the above primary symptoms, the Subject might also report nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea, but these symptoms alone are not sufficient to include the Subject in the study.
Subject is willing to provide consent/assent.
Subject is willing to have two (2) nasopharyngeal swabs collected for the study and in the event of inconclusive results, be willing to return to the site to have two (2) more nasopharyngeal swabs
Exclusion criteria
To be enrolled in the study, each Subject must not meet:
232 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal