Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The present study was set-up to evaluate clinical efficacy of Pixie® cryogenic pen versus two comparator cryogenic products (Wartner® and Wortie®) for the treatment of common and plantar warts.
Full description
The use of cryotherapy has been long known to be effective against warts. The indications for Pixie® are in line with the indications presented in the collected literature data, as well as with the indications of equivalent devices.
The benefits of warts treatment without the use of chemicals are clearly evidenced. The treatment period is much shorter (one treatment compared to daily application of keratinolytics or fluorouracil, over a period of a few weeks). The cryogen therapy application through a conic tip is much more precise than with chemical substances. Chemical substance application is leading to more side effects of the surrounding skin (typical for chemical treatment are pain, blistering, ulceration and contact dermatitis).
The Instructions for Use were developed in line with these data and are therefore covering all hazards known up to the date of this report.
Based on these data the product received its CE-mark approval
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
138 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal