Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Primary Objective: To quantify the benefits of the SENATOR decision support software on the reduction of ADR rates in older hospitalized patients. Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the effect of SENATOR with regard to use of appropriate non-pharmacological therapies in subjects with one core geriatric syndrome.
Tertiary Objectives: to examine the association of SENATOR use with subject survival, morbidity and health related quality of life.
Health Economic Objective: To examine the potential health economic consequences of using SENATOR.
There are two study phases:
Phase I: Prospective multinational, multicentre observational study to estimate the baseline adjudicated medical and surgical ADR rates by clinical subspeciality in 6 international sites.
Phase II: Prospective multinational, multicentre, block randomized, two parallel arm, open label, controlled trial, with blinded outcome ascertainment, of the efficacy of SENATOR software in reducing ADRs in older hospitalized subjects.
Full description
Phase I is designed to test the electronic case report form (eCRF) and the ADR ascertainment method in the six clinical sites in advance of Phase II (randomization phase).
In Phase I, we recruited 644 older multi-morbid patients from the 6 clinical sites. After obtaining written informed consent, patients' demographic, clinical and medication details were entered to the eCRF. In the event of one a 12 item Trigger List of adverse clinical events occurring, the eCRF automatically generated a Trigger List assessment proforma. The 12 items in the Trigger List included:
In addition, we have included 'Unspecified adverse event' in order to capture the wide range of well recognized ADRs associated with various medications. For example, the rapid onset of a generalized maculopapular rash in a patient with penicillin hypersensitivity would be identified as an ADR under the 'Unspecified adverse event' category.
ADR adjudication in Phase I was blinded and no ADR adjudications were undertaken by the site principal investigator (PI). ADRs were defined as 'definite', probable', 'possible', 'unlikely' or 'indeterminate' according to WHO-UMC ADR causality critria. ADR severity was defined according to a modified Hartwig ADR severity scale ranging from Level 1 (trivial) to Level 7 (fatal).
Consensus on ADR causality was achieved through a potential endpoint adjudication committee (PEPAC), whose members were the 6 clinical site PI's. A matrix for achieving consensus was devised, such that there was a final decision on the causality of all potential ADRs.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Admitted under:
Intention of primary team at the time of subject admission to seek a Geriatric Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology or Palliative Medicine in-patient consultation
Life expectancy in the opinion of the admitting clinician of < 3 months
Admission directly to an intensive care unit,
Admission with primary acute psychiatric illness (excluding delirium)
Admission with non-accidental overdose/self-harm
Anticipated immediate transfer to alternative non-participating clinical service/hospital
Clinical diagnosis of acute Liver failure
estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate <10 ml/min per 1.73 m2
Solid organ transplant recipients
Patients with malignancy receiving systemic chemotherapy
Hospitalized for elective procedure
Patient was more than 24 hours in the Emergency Department under the care of a different team to that which finally is in charge of them
Patients who are actively participating in another clinical trial
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,537 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal