ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Clinical Trial of Solifenacin Versus Placebo Plus Pessary for Women With Vaginal Prolapse (PESSARY)

Hartford Hospital logo

Hartford Hospital

Status and phase

Terminated
Phase 4

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Treatments

Drug: Placebo
Drug: Solifenacin
Device: Ring pessary with support, Cooper Surgical, Trumbell, CT Ref # MXPRS03 non-latex

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT01092624
TULI003042
VESI-9I04 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study will evaluate the effect of pessary therapy, with and without Solifenacin (Vesicare), on symptoms of over active bladder and bladder function in women with overactive bladder symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse.

Study Hypotheses:

Null hypothesis, HO: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does not improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo.

Alternate hypothesis, HA: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo.

Full description

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects approximately half of all women over age 501. The most common type of POP is anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Symptoms associated with POP include: voiding dysfunction, defecatory dysfunction and vaginal bulge symptoms. Treatments for pelvic organ prolapse include among other options, vaginal pessary or surgery. Several studies have documented improved vaginal bulge symptoms in women treated with a pessary2,3,4; however, data are sparse regarding the effect of pessaries on lower urinary tract symptoms, specifically with regard to over active bladder symptoms.

Overactive bladder, observed in approximately 40% of women 50 years of age or older, is very common in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Two retrospective studies have shown improvement in women with overactive bladder symptoms following treatment with a vaginal pessary. One study (using a non-validated questionnaire) found that, at two month follow-up, patients successfully fitted with a pessary experienced a reduction in slightly less than half of their urge incontinence symptoms.5 A second study (using the Sheffield pelvic organ prolapse symptom questionnaire), revealed that 4 months after insertion of a pessary, 38% of patients experienced reduced urinary urgency, and 29% experienced reduced urge urinary incontinence6. Despite these data, many women stop using a pessary secondary to complaints of increased urine incontinence. More information is needed on pessary therapy impact on bladder function.

Specific Aim(s):

This study will prospectively evaluate women with pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder symptoms treated with either

  1. a pessary and solifenacin, or
  2. a pessary and placebo. We will assess the effects of these therapies on overactive bladder symptoms over the course of the 14-week study.

Enrollment

94 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Have experienced symptoms of overactive bladder (e.g., urinary urgency, frequency, or urge incontinence) for at least 3 months. Specifically women must average 8 or more voids in 24 hours and have 3 or more episodes of urinary urgency or urge incontinence over the 72 hours when the diary is being completed.
  • A practitioner trained in the pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination will evaluate each woman's pelvic organ support and vaginal dimensions. Women with a stage 1 or greater vaginal prolapse will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • The presence of factors that would contraindicate use of antimuscarinic medications (e.g. urine retention, narrow angle glaucoma, uncontrolled constipation, dementia)
  • An existing condition that would contraindicate use of a vaginal pessary (e.g., patient's vaginal length <6 cm)
  • Patient is currently using a vaginal pessary.
  • Patient is unable to tolerate an object in vagina
  • Patient has a history of cervical, vaginal or endometrial cancer
  • Patient is not able to speak English
  • Patient is currently using an anticholinergic medication, or has used one in the past 30 days
  • Patients with mixed urine incontinence that is predominantly stress urine incontinence (determined by their baseline PFDI)
  • Patients with a known allergy to solifenacin.
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

94 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Pessary and solifenacin
Experimental group
Treatment:
Device: Ring pessary with support, Cooper Surgical, Trumbell, CT Ref # MXPRS03 non-latex
Drug: Solifenacin
Pessary and placebo
Placebo Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Ring pessary with support, Cooper Surgical, Trumbell, CT Ref # MXPRS03 non-latex
Drug: Placebo

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems