ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Clinical Utility of ESWT in Restoring Hand Function of Patients With Nerve Injury and Hypertrophic Scars Due to Burns

H

Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Hand Injuries
Burns
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

Treatments

Other: sham stimulation
Other: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06438224
HangangSHH-18

Details and patient eligibility

About

Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns. Researchers have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.

Full description

Burns that occur in the hand cause early joint range-of-motion (ROM) limitations and hand muscle weakness that significantly affect quality of life. Hand burns, though restricted to a small total body surface area (TBSA), can have significant functional consequences. Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns.

The investigators have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.

Enrollment

120 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years old
  • had sustained a deep partial-thickness (second-degree) or a full-thickness (third-degree) burn in the right dominant hand, which had been treated with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) after the thermal injury
  • nerve injury to the hand was confirmed by electromyography
  • < 6 months prior to the enrollment

Exclusion criteria

  • musculoskeletal diseases (fracture, amputation, rheumatoid arthritis, and degenerative joint diseases) of the hands
  • acute infection
  • malignant tumors
  • coagulopathy
  • pregnancy
  • potential for additional skin damage if exposed to ESWT and conventional occupational therapy.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

120 participants in 2 patient groups

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
Experimental group
Description:
Those in the ESWT group were asked to select the most hypertrophic and retracting scars for treatment. ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals.
Treatment:
Other: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
sham group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
the sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy
Treatment:
Other: sham stimulation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Sung Rakyum

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems