Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to determine whether handsewn anastomosis versus clipped technique is associated with more complications, fistula failures, surgical cost and surgical time.
Full description
End stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis has become more prevalent in recent years. Achieving vascular access is an important step in receiving hemodialysis. Recent national goals have established that approximately 65% of all dialysis access points should be arteriovenous fistulas due to higher patency rates and decreased rates of further surgeries. Multiple studies have been done to assess optimal suture technique for arteriovenous anastomoses. The use of clips versus a handsewn technique has been evaluated in retrospective studies with some reports indicating a higher primary patency rate with a clip technique. Further study is needed to definitively determine the technique that results in the highest patency rates and lowest rate of re-operation. The purpose of this study is to determine whether hand-sewn anastomosis versus a clipped technique is associated with more complications, failures, surgical cost and surgical time by randomizing patients to either a clipped anastomosis group or a handsewn anastomosis group.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Less than 18 years of age.
Inability to provide consent.
Previous failed AVFs in both arms.
Contraindications to AVF creation:
Anticipated inability to keep 30-day postoperative follow-up appointment.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
38 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal