Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief psychological intervention, cognitive-behavior therapy, for the management of persistent pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.
Full description
Research Design: A randomized controlled design will be employed in which CBT plus standard pharmaceutical care (CBT/SC) is compared to an educational intervention plus standard pharmaceutical care (ED/SC) treatment condition. A target sample size of approximately 215 participants will be recruited. Participants will be randomized in equal numbers to the two conditions.
Methodology: Study participants will be evaluated pre-treatment (baseline), 12 weeks post-baseline (post-treatment) and at 36 weeks post-baseline (follow-up). Baseline assessment will include a physical examination to confirm the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. The primary outcome measure will be pain intensity. Secondary outcome measures will be pain quality, pain-related disability, and physical and emotional functioning. Measures of treatment feasibility will also be examined. CBT and ED will be provided in 10 weekly, individual treatment sessions of 60 minutes. The effectiveness of the randomization process will be tested by examining potential between condition differences on important demographic and pain-relevant descriptive variables, as well as on the dependent measures. Analyses of covariance will be employed to determine whether statistically significant differences in the two treatment conditions are observed at the 12- and 36-week intervals controlling for pretreatment/baseline scores on these same measures and other covariates identified previously.
Hypotheses Treatment outcome hypotheses
Treatment satisfaction and feasibility hypotheses
Exploratory secondary analyses of predictors of treatment participation and outcome
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
47 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal