Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study evaluates the effects of opioid dose reduction in the treatment of chronic pain in adults. Participants were divided in two groups: 1) patients that reduced opioid dose and 2) patients that kept the same opioid dose for six months.
Full description
BACKGROUND The indications for initiating long-term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain are often unclear and may be associated with poor outcomes and problematic use. Few available studies demonstrated that opioids do not provide advantages regarding pain control, quality of life and functional capacity in this population and may have numerous serious adverse effects and consequences.
AIMS
This study aimed at:
METHODS
Study design
This is a prospective, single centre, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (1:1) conducted at the Multidisciplinary Pain Centre of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Two phases with nine assessments were planned. The Phase 1 was the stabilization phase and consisted of two assessments: the first assessment (baseline) was done when patients were admitted to the pain centre and the second assessment was done when medical treatment was considered stable for at least three weeks (stable dose levels and regular intervals). In the following patients went through Phase 2 and were randomized to receive the intervention (Taper off Group) or continue the same stable treatment (Control Group). Seven assessments were planned to this phase: third and fourth assessments were done in intervals of two to three weeks and the following assessments (fifth to ninth) with intervals of one month in between.
Intervention
The taper-off intervention consisted of a reduction of 10% of the daily opioid dose every 1-2 weeks until discontinuation of opioid treatment for up to six months. Clonidine use (25mg - 150mg/day) was allowed in cases of opioid withdrawal symptoms, according to medical prescription.
Analysis
Statistical analysis will be performed to compare baseline characteristics between groups (patients that complete the study vs. patients that dropped out and intervention vs. control group). Comparative analysis of primary and secondary outcomes between groups will also be performed to identify significant differences associated with the intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
75 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal