ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Community Medical Center, Continuous Quality Improvement Project, Rapid Sequence Intubation

C

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intubation, Intratracheal
Checklist
Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation

Treatments

Other: Standard Care
Other: Intubation Checklist

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

To assess the ongoing continuous quality improvement of rapid sequence intubation in our emergency department. Ongoing assessment will address standardization of the process and protocol driven measures that will improve the overall quality of the intervention.

Full description

Continuous evaluation and improvement of airway performance in the Emergency Department (ED) is essential for achieving positive clinical outcomes and reducing the incidence of related adverse events. First-pass success (FPS) in Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is the most commonly utilized metric for evaluation and allows for comparison across clinical environments. According to a variety of studies published over the last decade, including a large, multi-center systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean FPS rate (84%) has been used as an institutional benchmark for ED airway proficiency.

Unfortunately, many complications can arise during RSI, the incidence of which has remained high. These complications commonly lead to poor or life-threatening outcomes and include desaturation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, dental trauma, and esophageal intubation. According to the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anesthetists, it was determined that 30% of patients in the ED and 60% of patients in the ICU experiencing an airway related incident, suffered brain damage or death. The number of failed intubation attempts (3+) has been directly correlated with the an increased development of complications. Thus, establishing effective methods of decreasing the occurrence of failed attempts will result in an immediate reduction of unintended issues.

To maximize FPS and increase the safety of the procedure, it is essential to develop a tool to maximize efficacy. The introduction of checklists as a process improvement tool has been identified as a successful strategy for improving the effectiveness and quality of procedures throughout healthcare. Integration of a checklist in the RSI procedure will help to increase FPS rates and act as a method to aid in continuous evaluation and improvement of overall airway performance.

Although many airway performance improvement studies exist, our institution is unique in that we are a new Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency program that will be comprised of only post-graduate year 1 (PGY1) and post-graduate year 2 (PGY2) EM residents at the commencement of data collection. Furthermore, our clinical skills training process involves an integrative approach, pioneered by our interdisciplinary team of educators. Continuous evaluation of FPS and the incidence of RSI-related complications will allow for assessment of not only our quality improvement initiative, but of our educational methodology as well. Overall, implementation of quality and performance improvement strategies can mitigate the occurrence of adverse events and lead to improved health outcomes for our patients. This is of paramount importance to us as providers and to our community as a whole.

Enrollment

700 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Any patient undergoing endotracheal intubation in the Emergency department

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 years old

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Sequential Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

700 participants in 2 patient groups

Preintervention
Active Comparator group
Description:
Normal clinician intubation process
Treatment:
Other: Standard Care
Postintervention
Experimental group
Description:
Clinician intubation process after implementation and clinician education with a procedural checklist
Treatment:
Other: Intubation Checklist

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Josesph Roarty, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems