Comparaison of ESP Block and TAP Block

Mongi Slim Hospital

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Post Operative Pain

Treatments: Procedure: ESP Block; Procedure: TAP Block

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04176770

ESP in cholecystectomy

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aim to compare the efficiency and the analgesic effect of Erector Spinal Plane Block versus TAP Block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Full description

This study will include patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ASA status 1 or 2. patients will be randomized in 2 groups to recieve post operative analgesia with -ESP block: bilateral injection of 20 ml of isobaric Bupivacain 0,375% in the paraverebral space T5.

or

-TAP block: bilateral injection of 15 ml of Isobaric Bupivacain 0,5%

Enrollment: 80 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 99 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Adult patients
• ASA status I or II
• scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion criteria

• laparotomy
• unplanned ICU admission

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

80 participants in 2 patient groups

ESP group

Experimental group

Description:

ESP block: bilateral injection of 20 ml of isobaric Bupivacain 0,375% in the paraverebral space T5.

Treatment:

Procedure: ESP Block

TAP Block

Experimental group

Description:

TAP block: bilateral injection of 15 ml of Isobaric Bupivacain 0,5%

Treatment:

Procedure: TAP Block