Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This clinical trial compares three different treatment methods used to correct jaw problems in children with Class III malocclusion (a condition where the lower jaw is positioned forward relative to the upper jaw). The treatments include:
Rapid maxillary expansion with face mask (RME/FM),
Mini maxillary protractor (MMP),
Modified splints with elastics and chin cup (SEC III).
The study aims to understand how each treatment affects the bones and soft tissues of the face, such as how much the upper jaw moves forward or the lower jaw moves backward, as well as changes in teeth alignment and facial appearance. Results showed that different treatments work best for different aspects: some are better for moving the upper jaw forward, while others are better for repositioning the lower jaw. This information helps doctors choose the most suitable treatment plan for each patient.
Full description
This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates and compares the skeletal and three-dimensional soft tissue effects of three orthopedic treatment protocols in growing patients with Class III skeletal malocclusion. A total of 43 patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: rapid maxillary expansion with face mask (RME/FM), mini maxillary protractor (MMP), and modified splints with elastics and chin cup (SEC III). Additionally, a control group was formed from archival records of untreated patients with similar malocclusion characteristics.
Patients underwent comprehensive evaluation before and after treatment, including lateral cephalometric radiographs and 3D stereophotogrammetry to capture skeletal and soft tissue changes. Key parameters measured were maxillary and mandibular skeletal movements, dental inclination changes, overjet and overbite adjustments, as well as facial soft tissue displacement and angular measurements.
The study's design ensured rigorous randomization and controlled conditions to objectively assess the efficacy of each treatment protocol. The outcomes provide insight into how each method influences skeletal advancement or retrusion, dental positioning, and facial profile alterations, offering guidance for personalized treatment planning in orthodontic practice.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
55 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal