ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Analysis of Nemonoxacin and Other Anti-methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (Anti-MRSA) Antimicrobial Therapy in Patients With Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (cSSTI): a Retrospective Chart Review Study

National Taiwan University logo

National Taiwan University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue,cSSTI
Methicillin-susceptible S. Aureus (MSSA)
Anti-methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (Anti-MRSA)

Treatments

Other: Observational study, no intervention

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06959667
202502099RIND

Details and patient eligibility

About

Increasing rates of antimicrobial resistant bacterial infections and antimicrobial therapy at home in elderly are great concern for medical care. The availability of new antibacterial agents that are effective against bacteria with resistance to other antibacterials is therefore critical to continued successful management of bacterial illnesses in the future. Nemonoxacin is a C-8 methoxy, non-fluorinated quinolone that retains potent broad-spectrum activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by selective inhibition of bacterial DNA topoisomerase.

Nemonoxacin had greater in-vitro activity against many Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and ciprofloxacin-susceptible and ciprofloxacin-resistant MRSA, levofloxacin-susceptible and levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, enterococci, and Enterobacterieacea species except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lowe selected mutation of Nemonoxacin, compared with other fluoroquinolones against antimicrobial resistant gram-positive bacteria had been reported.[5] Nemonoxacin could be used once-daily oral and intravenous formulations for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, nemonoxacin has less evidence of efficacy for complicated skin and soft tissue infection. In this retrospective study, we will investigate the treatment outcomes of nemonoxacin and compared with other anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (anti-MRSA) antimicrobial therapy in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) by chart review.

Enrollment

144 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 99 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • complicated skin and soft tissue (cSSTI) infection

Exclusion criteria

  • no complicated skin and soft tissue (cSSTI) infection

Trial design

144 participants in 2 patient groups

Use other antimicrobial therapy (vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, linezolid, or other anti-MRSA
Description:
Use other antimicrobial therapy (vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, linezolid, or other anti-MRSA antibiotics)
Use Nemonoxacin
Description:
Use Nemonoxacin
Treatment:
Other: Observational study, no intervention

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems