ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Ovarian Stimulation With Menotropin Versus Menotropin Plus GnRH Antagonist (PROMENIA)

Ferring logo

Ferring

Status

Completed

Conditions

Sterility

Treatments

Drug: hMG + GnRH antagonist
Drug: hMG-HP

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT01331733
FER-MEN-2006-01

Details and patient eligibility

About

To assess the effectiveness of protocols of ovarian hyperstimulation combining urinary gonadotrophins + GnRH antagonist vs urinary gonadotrophins, to achieve clinical pregnancy in females undergoing intrauterine insemination.

Study hypothesis: protocols combining urinary gonadotrophins + GnRH antagonist should be more effective than monotherapy.

Enrollment

131 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 36 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18-36 years
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 26
  • Prolactin within the laboratory normal range
  • Couples affected by sterility able to treat by IUI (intrauterine insemination)
  • Patients undergoing Menopur® treatment
  • Normal thyroid function
  • Regular menses (21-35 days)
  • Couples willing to participate in the study that have signed the informed consent form
  • Seminal sample REM>3 million

Exclusion criteria

  • Two previous ART (assisted reproductive technology) cycles without ongoing pregnancy
  • Policystic ovarian syndrome
  • Evidence of significant bacterial infection in the seminogram of the couple in the preceding 6 months

Trial design

131 participants in 2 patient groups

hMG-HP
Description:
Patients with a condition
Treatment:
Drug: hMG-HP
hMG-HP + GnRH antagonist
Description:
Patients with a condition
Treatment:
Drug: hMG + GnRH antagonist

Trial contacts and locations

7

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems