ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Effectiveness of Microprocessor Controlled and Carbon Fiber Prosthetic Feet in Transtibial Amputees

A

Ability Prosthetics and Orthotics

Status

Completed

Conditions

Amputation

Treatments

Device: Kinnex
Device: Pacifica LP

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this research is to evaluate benefits of a microprocessor controlled prosthetic ankle-foot device compared to a non-microprocessor controlled or passive carbon fiber prosthetic ankle-foot device.

Full description

Recent advancements in microprocessor controlled prosthetic ankle-foot systems have allowed additional functionality for the lower limb amputee, but research into the effectiveness of microprocessor controlled ankle-foot systems has been limited.

In this research study, differences in perceived mobility, functional capabilities and gait parameters between energy storing and returning and microprocessor controlled ankle-foot mechanisms will be identified where they exist. Also a comparison of the initial function with a new system compared to the function after a four week accommodation period will provide insight into the time it takes for the prosthesis user to experience a benefit from a microprocessor ankle-foot.

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 99 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral transtibial amputation
  • Age 18-99 years old
  • Body weight below 275 lbs
  • Non-pregnant
  • English speaking
  • Current user of prosthesis for at least one year
  • Wear time 8 hrs/day or more
  • MFCL ≥ K-3
  • Well-fitting and functioning prosthesis
  • No use of ambulatory aide
  • Able to tolerate testing protocol
  • Able to walk on slopes
  • Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be willing and able to complete all aspects of the study, adhere to the study visit schedule and comply with the assessments

Exclusion criteria

  • Amputation level other than unilateral transtibial
  • Age <18 or >99 years old
  • Body weight above 275 lbs
  • Pregnant
  • Non-English speaking
  • Not current user of prosthesis
  • Less than one year use of prosthesis
  • Wear time less than 8 hr/day
  • MFCL <K3
  • Poor fitting and functioning prosthesis
  • Indicating that the socket fit is painful, or unacceptable
  • Use of ambulatory aide
  • Unable to tolerate testing protocol
  • Unable to walk on slopes
  • Presence or history of any condition that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study
  • Any neurologic impairments known to cause gait and/or balance dysfunction

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Configuration A (Kinnex)
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Kinnex
Configuration B (Pacifica LP)
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Pacifica LP

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems