Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to compare three different revascularization strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease: MICS CABG, OPCABG and ONCABG.
The study hypothesis: MICS CABG (Minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting) has advantages in comparison with conventional off-pump (OPCABG) and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG) concerning major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and procedural success.
Full description
Prospective, single-center, randomized trial, intended to compare three different revascularization strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease:
The secondary endpoints: Procedural success, Procedural and post-procedural blood loss and number of transfusions, Wound complications, Recovery time, Heart Failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA)), Life quality assessed by one of the life quality questionnaires.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mikalai G Laiko, MD; Aliaksandr A Ziankou, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal