Comparative Effects of Propioceptive Neuromascular Facilitation and Neural Flossing in Diabetic Neuropathy

Riphah International University

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Treatments: Other: Neural Flossing; Other: Propioceptive Neuromascular facilitation

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06397209

REC/RCR&AHS/23/0275

Details and patient eligibility

About

To compare the effects of propioceptive neuromascular facilitation and neural flossing on balance and gait in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Full description

In 2023,conducted systematic review to evaluate the effects of Tai Chi on postural control in people with PN. The meta-analysis found that Tai Chi therapy for people with PN resulted in a smaller sway area, in the double-leg stance with eyes closed test , than that observed in the control group, greater distance covered in the six-minute walking test and faster performance in the timed-up-and-go test, than the baseline. Tai chi effectively enhanced dynamic postural control in people with PN. However, no better effects on postural control from Tai Chi than from other rehabilitation approaches were observed in this study.

In 2023,compare the effects of Functional strength training Versus Neurodynamic exercises on Balance and Gait of patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Both Functional Strength Training Exercises and Neurodynamic Exercises were found to improve the Balance and Gait in patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. However, the Functional Strength Training showed more significantly improvement in Balance and Gait subsequently reducing fall and fall risk injury.

As per researcher knowledge, there is no comprehensive study comparing the effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Neural Flossing on balance and gait in individuals with diabetic neuropathy. While both methods have been studied independently, a direct head-to-head comparison is needed. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each approach in the context of diabetic neuropathy could provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers.

Enrollment: 50 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 45 to 65 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Clinically Diagnosed with type I and II diabetes
• Patients 45 to 65 years of age
• The participants who scored <3 as per the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) were included in the study.
• Able to stand and walk without assistance

Exclusion criteria

• Patients have other neurological or orthopedic impairments (such as stroke,cerebral palsy, poliomyelitis, rheumatoid arthritis, prosthesis, or moderate or severe osteoarthritis)
• Major vascular complications (venous or arterial ulcers).
• Severe retinopathy
• Severe nephropathy that causes edema or requires haemodialysis

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

50 participants in 2 patient groups

proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation

Experimental group

Description:

Propioceptive neuromascular facilitation alongwith routine therapy

Treatment:

Other: Propioceptive Neuromascular facilitation

Neural flossing

Active Comparator group

Description:

Neural flossing alongwith routine therapy

Treatment:

Other: Neural Flossing