ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in IUD Insertion

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Contraception

Treatments

Drug: lidocaine spray
Drug: vaginal misoprostol
Drug: placebo

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04339049
lidocaine IUD

Details and patient eligibility

About

the aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of lidocaine spray versus misoprostol in reducing pain during IUD insertion in adolescents and nulliparous women

Enrollment

147 patients

Sex

Female

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • adolescent and young nulliparous women requesting IUD insertion

Exclusion criteria

  • multiparous women, contraindications to IUD insertion or to study drugs

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

147 participants in 3 patient groups, including a placebo group

lidocaine spray
Experimental group
Description:
four puffs (10 mg/puff) of lidocaine spray before tenaculum placement plus vaginal placebo 3 hours before IUD insertion
Treatment:
Drug: lidocaine spray
vaginal misoprostol
Active Comparator group
Description:
vaginal misoprostol 200 mcg given 3 hours before IUD insertion plus four puffs of saline spray before tenaculum placement
Treatment:
Drug: vaginal misoprostol
placebo
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
vaginal placebo given 3 hours before IUD insertion plus four puffs of saline spray before tenaculum placement
Treatment:
Drug: placebo

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems