ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Evaluation Between the Effectiveness of Vibration Assisted Syringe and Conventional Syringe

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Anxiety, Dental

Treatments

Device: vibraject

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04215055
Vibraject in Dentistry

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of the vibration assisted syringe on pain perception and anxiety in children during intra oral injection of local anesthesia in comparison with conventional syringe.

Full description

As for granted the main concern in pediatric dentistry is to guarantee a positive response from child for any further appointments, that's why we aim to manage a successful dental procedure keeping a stress free situation. Conventional local anesthetic technique is the most commonly used technique for anesthetizing teeth but in turn it has shown the highest levels of discomfort in comparison with other techniques. VibraJect is vibration associated syringe device, it is simple and cost effective solution to alleviate injection discomfort. It works because the light pressure of a Vibraject injection is carried rapidly to the brain by thicker insulated nerve tissues. In contrast, the needle prick travels on thinner nerve tissues, arriving too late for the brain to register the sensation. Vibraject is good news for the patient, because the anesthetic itself causes virtually no discomfort and good news for the dentist, who can work easily knowing that patient, is comfortable.

Enrollment

46 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

4 to 6 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

inclusion criteria

  1. Cooperative patient. (rating 4 or 3 based on Frankl behavior scale).
  2. Children aging from 4 to 6 years
  3. Suffering from one or more deep carious lesions in their primary molars.
  4. Restorable primary molars

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medically compromised patients.
  2. Uncooperative children (rating 1 or 2 on the Frankl behavior scale) needing special line of treatment through general anesthesia.
  3. Signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis, spontaneous pain, necrosis or any signs and symptoms of abscess.
  4. Presence of any radiographic signs of abscess, bone loss, internal or external root resorption.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

46 participants in 2 patient groups

study group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group I (study group); children receiving intraoral injection of local anasethia using the vibration assisted syringe.
Treatment:
Device: vibraject
control group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group II (control group): children receiving intraoral injection of local anasethia using the standard syringe.
Treatment:
Device: vibraject

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

mohamed abdallah

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems