ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

T

Tata Main Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Laryngeal Masks

Treatments

Device: ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Device: AmbuAuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03139292
201-26104-152-206580

Details and patient eligibility

About

Comparison of two different supraglottic airway devices i.e., the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) and Ambu AuraGain, a third generation laryngeal mask Airway.

Full description

The study aims to compare the two devices with respect to:

Time taken for insertion. Insertion attempts or failed attempt. Oropharyngeal leak pressure Air leak Time taken to pass an orogastric tube Attempts to pass an orogastric tube or failed attempt. Haemodynamic variation Incidence of adverse events like failed insertion, aspiration-regurgitation, hypoxia (SpO2< 90%), bronchospasm, airway obstruction, gastric insufflation, coughing, gagging, retching, hiccup, coughing during removal, blood staining of the airway device and trauma to tongue, lip, teeth, or gums.

Enrollment

160 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I & II
  2. Patients undergoing limb or breast surgery
  3. Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia and spontaneous ventilation.
  4. Patients with expected duration of surgery of less than 2 hours.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with known or predicted difficult airway or Mallampati Grade (MPG) III or IV
  2. Patients with mouth opening of less than 2.5 cm or cervical spine disease
  3. Patients with H/o upper respiratory tract infection in the previous 10 days.
  4. Patients with increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration (non-fasting patients, gastroesophageal reflux disease etc.)
  5. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2
  6. Patients with past history of radiotherapy involving the hypopharynx/neck area 7Patients with expected duration of surgery of more than 2 hours.

8.Surgery to be performed to the head, neck or thorax, abdomen or in the lateral or prone positions

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

160 participants in 2 patient groups

ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Experimental group
Description:
Intravenous (0.02mg/kg Midazolam and 2 microgram/kg Fentanyl) and oxygen via a face mask will be administered. Two minutes later, general anesthesia will be induced using 2 mg/kg intravenous Propofol mixed with 25 mg Lidocaine Injected over 30 seconds, Mask ventilation commence and continue for at least 30 seconds until conditions are suitable for PLMA insertion
Treatment:
Device: ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
AmbuAuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway
Experimental group
Description:
Intravenous (0.02mg/kg Midazolam and 2 microgram/kg Fentanyl) and oxygen via a face mask will be administered. Two minutes later, general anesthesia will be induced using 2 mg/kg intravenous Propofol mixed with 25 mg Lidocaine Injected over 30 seconds, Mask ventilation commence and continue for at least 30 seconds until conditions are suitable for AmbuAuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion
Treatment:
Device: AmbuAuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems