ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Outcomes of Four Versus Two Balloon Inflation Points in Dacryoplasty for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

National Taiwan University logo

National Taiwan University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Treatments

Device: 2 point balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH®
Device: 4 point balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH®

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07225244
202509023RIND

Details and patient eligibility

About

Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

20+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are pregnant, with previous lacrimal procedure, upper lacrimal drainage obstruction, punctal stenosis, active dacryocystitis, dacryolithiasis, traumatic obstruction or lacrimal mass

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

4-point group
Experimental group
Description:
Balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH® at 4 different points in the nasolacrimal duct
Treatment:
Device: 4 point balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH®
2-point group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH® at 2 different points in the nasolacrimal duct
Treatment:
Device: 2 point balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH®

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Meng-Ju Lin, MD; Yi-Hsuan Wei, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems