ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Research Among 3 Action Protocol in Other to Approach Chronic Lateral Epicondyle Tendinopathy

U

Universidad San Jorge

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Tendinopathy

Treatments

Other: Control Group
Other: Group of Dry Needling
Other: Group of Electrolysis

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03572803
C3P_CLET

Details and patient eligibility

About

The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercises and stretching program in patients with chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercises program realized of isolated form.

Full description

Experimental study randomized with double blind, whose purpose is to compare three protocols in those who apply different protocols of physical therapy to themselves in three groups of intervention with patients with chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.

There take part in this study people of both sexes, with ages between 18 and 65 years, all of them present chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy.

Enrollment

66 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years.
  • Patients diagnosed of chronic lateral epicondyle tendinopathy with a minimum of 3 months of evolution.
  • Pain when palpating the lateral epicondyle area.
  • Positive test in at least 1 of the following 3 clinical tests: Cozen, Thomson or Mill's
  • Have the capacity to perform all clinical tests, understand the study process, and obtain informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous history of direct trauma, fractures, joint instability, surgery or rheumatic alterations of the lateral epicondyle area.
  • Full elbow extension limited.
  • Alterations at cervical level such as: cervical radiculopathy (C4-C7), degenerative pathology in the cervical spine, exacerbated pain increase with neck movements or cervical compression.
  • Symptoms compatible with entrapment of the posterior interosseous nerve.
  • NSAID intake the week before the intervention;
  • Have received treatment with infiltration in the last year;
  • Have received physiotherapy treatment during the last month.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

66 participants in 3 patient groups

Group of Dry Needling
Active Comparator group
Description:
They will receive a treatment of dry needling, guided by ultrasound, together with a self-treatment program at home based on eccentric exercises and stretching. The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized using Hong's technique (fast in-out). Three needle insertions will be carried out in the target area during 3 seconds
Treatment:
Other: Group of Dry Needling
Group of electrolysis
Active Comparator group
Description:
They will receive a treatment of Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis, guided by ultrasound, together with a self-treatment program at home based on eccentric exercises and stretching. The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized simulating Hong's technique (fast in-out). Three needle insertions will be carried out in the target area during 3 seconds and 3mA each one.
Treatment:
Other: Group of Electrolysis
Control Group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
They will receive a treatment of punction sham, guided by ultrasound, together with a self-treatment program at home based on eccentric exercises and stretching.
Treatment:
Other: Control Group

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Rita Mª Galán Díaz, MD; Pablo Herrero Gallego, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems