ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Comparative Study of the Effect of Ezetimibe Versus Extended-Release Niacin on Atherosclerosis

W

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Status and phase

Terminated
Phase 4

Conditions

Atherosclerosis

Treatments

Drug: ezetimibe
Drug: extended release niacin

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other U.S. Federal agency
Industry

Identifiers

NCT00397657
06-12027

Details and patient eligibility

About

Recent evidence on the use of statin therapy indicates the potential for ultra-low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) to provide greater protection from recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events. Thus, in August 2005, the guidelines for the treatment of lipid disorders (NCEP ATPIII) were revised to indicate that an LDL-C treatment goal of 70 mg/dL (revised from 100 mg/dL) was optional for patients with known CHD. In these same guidelines, low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) are also suggested but not specifically proscribed as a target of therapy. Recently the ARBITER 2 trial has provided the first evidence of the potential of raising HDL-C with extended release niacin when added to statin monotherapy. However, whether this approach would be superior to a strategy in which lower concentrations of LDL-C are targeted is unknown.

The purpose of ARBITER 6 - HALTS is to compare HDL and LDL-focused strategies of lipid treatments for their effects of atherosclerosis. This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial comparing treatment strategies of either HDL-raising therapies or LDL reduction for dyslipidemia on carotid atherosclerosis. Subjects with known atherosclerotic coronary or vascular disease or otherwise at high cardiovascular risk through the presence of a coronary risk equivalent who are currently being treated with a statin will be eligible. Subjects will be randomly assigned in an allocation-concealed fashion to open label treatment with either Ezetimibe 10 mg/d for additional LDL-lowering OR Extended-release niacin (1 gm/d, titrated to max tolerable dose up to 2 gm/d) for HDL improvement.

The effects of these 2 different strategies of intensified lipid management on atherosclerosis will be assessed by the change in the carotid intima-media thickness, a validated surrogate endpoint. The data will help guide clinicians on the potential benefits of these lipid treatment strategies.

Enrollment

400 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

30+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female subjects, ≥ 30 years old with either known atherosclerotic coronary or vascular disease OR coronary risk equivalents defined as either:

    • diabetes mellitus,
    • multiple coronary risk factors with a Framingham Risk Score > 2% per year, or
    • an elevated coronary calcium score (> 400 for men, > 200 for women)
  • Currently being treated with a statin (Simvastatin 20 mg/d or its equivalent) as monotherapy for treatment of hyperlipidemia

  • Recent lipids (within the past 3 months without interval change in the statin regimen) showing both: LDL-C < 100 mg/dL and HDL-C < 50 mg/dL (men) or < 55 mg/dL (women)

Exclusion criteria

  • Current use of or known intolerance to niacin or ezetimibe
  • Known history of liver disease (cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis) or abnormal liver associated enzymes, > 3x the upper laboratory reference value
  • Enrollment in another drug or device research protocol
  • Females who are pregnant, expect to get pregnant during the course of the study, or are breastfeeding

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

400 participants in 2 patient groups

Extended release niacin
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: extended release niacin
Drug: ezetimibe
Ezetimibe
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Drug: ezetimibe

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems