Compare Effects of Intensive Versus Conventional Lipid-lowering Therapy in Patients With Severe Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis Undergoing Stent Placement

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 3; Phase 2

Conditions: Lipids; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Stents; Blood Pressure; Renal Artery Obstruction

Treatments: Drug: Rosuvastatin

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03521700

2014-ZX13

Details and patient eligibility

About

Although expert consensuses recommend the use of statins in the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, in patients with severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis undergoing stent placement, the related investigation focused on renal protection by intensive lipid-lowering therapy is scant , and the optimal target level for lipid reduction remain uncertain. Therefore, we hypothesized that intensive lipid lowering could offer more benefits with respect to renal function in the patients with percutaneous renal artery stenting. We conducted the prospective randomized unblinded trial to compare the renal-protective effect of intensive lipid lowering with that of conventional lipid lowering in patients underwent renal artery stenting (75 patients in each study group)

Enrollment: 150 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 40 to 80 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Angiographic evidence of severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (diameter reduction≥ 70%) with ≥ 20 mmHg systolic translesional gradient or positive captopril renography in the target kidney;
2. Sustained systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg while not receiving drug therapy or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90mmHg while taking standard triple-drug combination treatment (including one diuretic);
3. Estimated glomerular filtration rate≥ 10 ml/min/1.73m2 with longitudinal kidney length ≥ 7 cm supplied by target artery;
4. Serum creatinine level<264umol/L；
5. Urine protein≤ 1+

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to rosuvastatin;
2. Myopathy;
3. Active liver disease or alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels ≥ three times the upper limit of normality;
4. Serious perioperative complications;
5. Severe chronic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class IV );
6. Patients who should be excluded basing on physician discretion.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

150 participants in 2 patient groups

Intensive lipid lowering group

Experimental group

Description:

10 mg/d rosuvastatin was initially prescribed and target LDL-C was \< 1.8mmol/L

Treatment:

Drug: Rosuvastatin

Conventional lipid lowering group

Other group

Description:

5 mg/d rosuvastatin was initially prescribed and target LDL-C was ≥1.8mmol/L, \<3.3mmol/L

Treatment:

Drug: Rosuvastatin