Comparing Between XP Endo Finisher and Conventional Irrigation Method On Post-Operative Flare Ups In Necrotic Teeth

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Dental Pulp Necroses

Treatments: Procedure: Conventional needle irrigation only; Procedure: XP Endo Finsher as final step of the irrigation protocol

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02952326

XP and Protaper next

Details and patient eligibility

About

Comparing the postoperative flare ups and pain after adding the XP Endo Finisher to the final irrigation protocol on necrotic mandibular premolars.

Full description

patients are randomized into 2 groups after meeting the eligibility criteria,

1. Each patient will be given pain scale chart in order to record his /her pain level before any intervention.
2. The tooth is anesthetized, accessed and mechanical instrumentation to be made 3 A) For the experimental group: The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation

B) For the control group :

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.

4. Obturation is done and postoperative instructions are given to the patient

Enrollment: 34 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 45 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

i. Age between 18-50 years old. ii. Males or Females. iii. mandibular Premolars

• Asymptomatic.
• Non-vital response of pulp tissue (negative response).
• With or without periapical radiolucency.

Exclusion criteria

i. Patients allergic to penicillin. ii. Pregnant females. iii. Patients having significant systemic disorder. iv. If antibiotics have been administrated during the past two weeks preoperatively.

v. Patients having bruxism or clenching. vi. Teeth that have :

• Vital pulp tissues.
• Association with swelling
• Acute peri-apical abscess
• Periodontally affected teeth
• No possible restorability
• Previous endodontic treatment.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

34 participants in 2 patient groups

XP Endo Finisher

Experimental group

Treatment:

Procedure: XP Endo Finsher as final step of the irrigation protocol

Conventional needle irrigation

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Procedure: Conventional needle irrigation only