Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Cardiac surgery patients often experience elevated blood glucose levels, which can lead to poor surgical outcomes and increased postoperative complications. Therefore, tight blood glucose control during surgery is important. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method for blood glucose control during cardiac surgery. This proposal aims to perform a randomized controlled trial to compare blood glucose control intraoperatively using an insulin drip versus insulin boluses. The primary objective of the study is to compare blood glucose control intraoperatively between patients who receive insulin drip and patients who receive insulin boluses during adult cardiac surgery. This study will be a randomized controlled trial in which adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery will be randomized into two groups: insulin drip and insulin boluses. Patients with a history of diabetes or those currently taking antidiabetic medications will be included in the study. This randomized controlled trial will provide valuable information on the optimal method for achieving blood glucose control intraoperatively. The results of this study may help improve patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
Full description
Study Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intraoperative Blood Glucose Control Between Insulin Drip Versus Insulin Boluses in Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients
Sponsor and Funding:
Sponsor: None
Funding Organization: King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah
Study Site: Single center at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah
Background and Rationale:
Maintaining optimal blood glucose levels during cardiac surgery is critical for reducing postoperative complications and improving patient outcomes. Current intraoperative glucose management strategies vary, with insulin administered either continuously via infusion (drip) or intermittently as boluses. This trial investigates which method provides superior glucose control intraoperatively.
Study Design:
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel arms:
Insulin drip group (continuous infusion)
Insulin bolus group (intermittent dosing)
Objectives:
Primary Objective: To compare the effectiveness of insulin drip versus insulin boluses in maintaining intraoperative blood glucose within target ranges during adult cardiac surgery.
Secondary Objectives: To assess the incidence of hypoglycemic events, insulin dose adjustments, duration of ICU stay, lactate clearance, and wound infection rates at 7- and 30-days post-surgery.
Endpoints:
Primary Endpoint: Rate of severe hypoglycemia during surgery.
Secondary Endpoints: ICU length of stay, postoperative lactate clearance, incidence of surgical wound infections at 7- and 30-days post-operation.
Participants:
Sample Size: 384 total participants, randomized equally into two groups (192 per group).
Inclusion Criteria: Adults aged over 18 years undergoing cardiac surgery, preoperative blood glucose between 80-180 mg/dL, with a documented history of diabetes.
Exclusion Criteria: Known intolerance to insulin, severe hepatic dysfunction, recent hypoglycemic episodes.
Intervention Protocols:
Insulin Drip Group: Continuous intravenous insulin infusion initiated at 2 units/hour, titrated to maintain target intraoperative glucose levels.
Insulin Bolus Group: Insulin administered as bolus doses every 30 minutes, adjusted based on glucose monitoring.
Data Collection and Follow-up:
Blood glucose and other relevant clinical parameters are monitored intraoperatively. Participants are followed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year to evaluate long-term outcomes and complications. The total anticipated duration of the trial is 4 years.
Statistical Analysis:
Data analysis will involve calculation of relative risk for hypoglycemia and other categorical outcomes. Time-to-event data will be analyzed using log-rank tests. Statistical significance is defined as p < 0.05.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
384 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal