Comparing Driving Performance Among Trained and Untrained Drivers Using a Driving Simulator
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
Details and patient eligibility
About
The purpose of this study is to examine differences in driving performance on a simulated driving assessment between novice teen drivers who receive the Risk Anticipation-Perception Training (RAPT) program and novice teen drivers who do not receive the training program.
Full description
Motor vehicle crashes remain the number one cause of death among teens in the United States. Teen drivers (ages 16 to 19) are four times more likely to be involved in fatal crashes than adult drivers (ages 25 to 69). Driving simulators are a safer alternative to on-road assessments that are often affordable and can provide experimental control for research. Though driving simulators have advantages for evaluating driving performance in teens, there are gaps in the literature on the validity of a multidimensional outcome of driving performance in a simulator. To further examine the validity of a multidimensional measure of driving performance in a simulator, we compare simulated driving performance among teens who are trained hazard anticipation-perception training and those who are not.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
- Holds a valid driver's license for less than or equal to 180 days
- 16 - 18 years of age
Exclusion criteria
- Self-reports claustrophobia, migraine headaches, and/or motion sickness
- Females who are pregnant
- Previously participated in another CHOP driving simulator study
- Non-English Speaking
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
50 participants in 2 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal