Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Research objective To compare effectiveness of oral Misoprostal for cervical priming in premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy Research hypothesis: Null hypothesis Effectiveness of oral misoprostal for cervical priming in premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy is not different from placebo Alternative hypothesis: : Oral Misoprostal for cervical priming in Premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy is better than placebo
Full description
Research design Randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. The investigators who assess the outcomes and the participants do not know Misoprostal group or control group. The patients are given the random concealed envelop which contains Misoprostal or placebo to take before hysteroscopy. Surgeon and the investigator whom assess patients do not know group allocation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Premenopausal women
Patients have following indication for diagnosis hysteroscopy
Patients provided written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Postmenopausal women
Patients who have contraindication for Misoprostal as following
Patients who have contraindication for Hysteroscopoy as following
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
17 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal